Being a scholarly man, I have naturally abhorrent eyesight. My
visual acuity is about 20/500, in both eyes. When compared to the perfect
eyesight of 20/20… I’m not doing too hot. But I wondered, as I put in my
contacts for astigmatism, what that number actually measured. What does it
mean? How is my eye so horribly out-of-whack?
Leonardo DaVinci was one of the first scientists to observe
that the eye’s sole purpose was to gather light beams into the lens, at the
pupil of the eye. The lens focuses this light on the retina in the back, the
signals from which are then sent through the optic nerve for interpretation. Photoreceptor
neurons called rods and cones are responsible for this signal shift from the
retina to the brain. Rods provide vision in dim light, working purely in black
and white, while cones work in bright light and provide color. A third type of
cells, called ganglions, make your eye react to sudden changes in light, like
when you come out of a dark room on a sunny day.
Your dark, lonely room. |
To get the right optic bend in the light that your eye is
gathering, your eye muscles actually contract to bend the lens one way or
another using things called the ciliary muscles.
Sometimes, though, this doesn't work. As you mature, your eye changes shape slowly, and this can affect your visual acuity. Longer
eyeballs usually mean that a person is myopic, or near-sighted; shorter, and
that person is hyperopic, or far-sighted. No matter what the ciliary muscles
do, they just can’t compensate for that lack of focus, making that person’s
eyesight permanently off-kilter.
The scientist Hermann van Helmholtz actually figured this
out by studying the anatomy of the eye itself. He ultimately concluded that,
well, the eye was pretty bad at doing its job. Apparently, it gives the brain
so little information that the brain has to make assumptions to fill in the
gaps, i.e. light comes from above, objects aren’t viewed from the bottom, and
faces are always right side up. Messing with these assumptions is what creates
optical illusions.
Pictured: not what you pictured |
Some or even all of these problems may be happening to me,
but my real issue is the astigmatism. An astigmatism, in the purely mathematical
sense, is a lens that creates two different foci from two different
perpendicular planes. In a biological sense, it means that my eye is creating
two images of an object, one in the horizontal plane and one in the vertical
plane, and neither of them is in focus where they should be. This, in
combination with elongation of my eye, makes my eyesight just horrible. Of
course, the miracles of optical science have found a way to fix this: just use
the correct lens to cancel out the abhorrent things that mine is doing. Instead
of having a perfect dome shape, like a normal contact would, contacts for
astigmatism instead look like the side of a football,
bending the horizontal and vertical light beams in different patterns to
achieve focus on my retina.
With my contacts in, I can see 20/15, or about 1.5x normal
acuity. Though this kind of sight is excellent, some people can achieve 20/10
vision, or 2x the normal visual acuity, without the use of ocular aids. Such
eagle-eyes include John Glenn,
Chuck Yeager, and Ted Williams, all of whom
certainly used their superior vision to its capabilities. Sadly, my naturally
bad eyesight means that I’ll never be a jet pilot, at least not without some
serious surgery. However, I have hope that one day, my children will have even worse eyesight than me.
Or they'll just become Sea Gypsies. No lie. |
> "As you mature, your eye changes shape slowly, and this can affect your visual acuity... scientist Hermann van Helmholtz actually figured this out by studying the anatomy of the eye itself. He ultimately concluded that, well, the eye was pretty bad at doing its job."
ReplyDeleteThere you have it. This is a shot in the ankle to all those who cite the 'perfection' of the human eye as evidence for Creationism. That's not to say the human eye is not a wonderfully sophisticated light sensing organ; simply, if anything, it's 'perfectly imperfect'. After all, as is written here:
"Apparently, it [the human eye] gives the brain so little information that the brain has to make assumptions to fill in the gaps... Messing with these assumptions is what creates optical illusions."
The drawing showing the ciliary muscles contracted for distance vision and relaxed for close vistion has it reversed--they are relaxed for distance vision and contracted for close vision. This is easily noticed when you bring something so close that you have to struggle to focus on it.
ReplyDeleteThe physiology of this is that the lens' unstressed shape is the fat, close vision, shape. It is stretched to the thin, far vision, shape by tension in the supporting ligaments that are attached to a rigid surrounding framework. When the ciliary muscles contract, they compress this framework, relaxing the tension in the ligaments, allowing the lens to relax to its fat, close vision, shape. As you age, the lens becomes stiff, and since it is normally in the relaxed ciliary muscles thin shape, it becomes stiff in the thin shape. At that point, it makes no difference how strong the ciliary muscles are; all they can do is release the tension in the ligaments.