Do  you remember that post I wrote on antimatter about a week ago? Near the  conclusion, I speculated that there could be whole antimatter galaxies  that science has yet to discover, and thus blew your mind with physics.  Well, someone decided to take it a step further. The physicist Dragan  Hajdukovic recently published a paper  describing an alternate Big Bang theory, one that I found fascinating.  In his theory, the universe eventually stops expanding, shrinks down,  and then switches all of its matter into antimatter. 
....what.
That’s  right: we would live in an antimatter universe. Let’s Tarantino this  theory and see how Dragan came to this shocking conclusion.
First  of all, scientists have established that there are places that contain  absolutely nothing; they refer to these ‘empty’ spaces as quantum  vacuums. Yet even in a quantum vacuum, electromagnetic waves float in  and out constantly, and ‘virtual’ particles instantaneously appear and  disappear. To make a real matter-antimatter pair out of these virtual  particles, they have to be influenced by a strong electromagnetic field  themselves, a process known as the Schwinger mechanism. 
Originally,  scientists hypothesized that when the universe began to crush itself  under the force of its own gravity, it would condense everything into an  infinitesimal point, then explode outward again, creating another  universe in the process. Hajdukovic disagrees, precisely because of the  effects of the Schwinger mechanism. He theorizes that, when the universe  is just starting to super-condense into that singularity, the  gravitational forces will be so strong that they will provide the same  energy to virtual particles that electromagnetic fields would, turning  them into very real matter-antimatter fundamental particles. Since  matter and antimatter repel each other at extremely close distances, a  super-condensed universe would just start repelling everything without  discretion, changing all existing matter into antimatter in the  process. 
This  is a big departure from classical Big Bang theory. For one,  Hajdukovic’s theory implies that the smallest the universe would ever  have to get is around a couple of kilometers for everything to switch  matter type. And the time that it would take to make that turn-around? A  fraction of a fraction of a second. The whole thing almost sounds too  good… but that’s Hajdukovic’s point. He pointed out in a recent article  that most theories of the universe fail to account for some pretty  serious phenomena, like dark matter and the dominance of matter over  antimatter. Several existing Big Bang models try and fit a fact to a  theory, rather than a theory to a fact; as Sherlock Holmes would put it,  many physicists were implying, not inferring, a big no-no when trying  to solve this kind of mystery. 
|  | 
| Watson Disapproves. | 
Yet, regardless of whether his hypothesis is right or  wrong, his suggestion certainly opens the doors to a wider range of  theory, one that brings all facets of the universe, including those we  don’t fully understand, into account. Just imagine what the universe would be if we were all antimatter beings...


 
 
Hey, did you see this: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128221.100-existence-why-is-there-a-universe.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news
ReplyDeleteI'm not science-y enough to be able to fully understand the relation between that article and your post, but nevertheless my mind is blown.